김민수: Hi everyone, can you hear me clearly?
John Smith: Loud and clear, Min-Soo. Your background looks way more professional than mine—an actual bookshelf?
김민수: Oh, this? Just some old books and a few props for show. It does the trick in meetings!
Alice Johnson: It’s working, trust me. Meanwhile, I’m praying my cat doesn’t decide to join the call uninvited.
이영희: I can relate. My dog almost hit “Leave Meeting” on my keyboard last week.
박지훈: It’s always the pets. Last time, my dog barked right when I was explaining a bug during the demo. Talk about timing!
김민수: Sounds like we all have stories about pets joining calls! Alright, before we lose track, let’s get started.
The goal of this project is to develop a customer-facing app to streamline the onboarding process for new users. We’re aiming for an intuitive, seamless experience from registration to first use.
박지훈: So basically, an app that we wish existed when we first joined the company?
김민수: Exactly, Ji-Hoon. Alright, John, can you walk us through HQ’s proposed tech stack?
John Smith: Sure thing. For the frontend, we’re recommending React because of its scalability and strong community support. On the backend, we’re looking at Node.js with MongoDB.
이영희: React sounds good. Are you leaning towards Redux for state management, or is Context API sufficient?
John Smith: Redux, definitely. It’s more robust, especially for larger applications. Though I won’t deny, it has a steep learning curve. If the team prefers something simpler for state management in smaller components, Context API might suffice in some cases.
Alice Johnson: Oh, I still remember my first Redux project. It felt like trying to solve a Rubik’s Cube blindfolded!
이영희: Same here. It’s a rite of passage for every developer.
박지훈: And once you get it, you feel like you’ve unlocked a whole new level of superpowers.
김민수: Seems like Redux is the clear choice here. Let’s also talk CI/CD—how do we plan to manage integration and deployment?
John Smith: Good question. At HQ, we’ve been using Jenkins for CI and GitHub Actions for deployment automation. It’s worked well for us.
Alice Johnson: For automated testing, we can use Mocha for the backend and Cypress for end-to-end testing. What do you think, Ji-Hoon?
박지훈: Cypress is a strong choice for E2E tests. For API testing, I’d suggest adding Postman to the mix.
이영희: That’s a great setup. How about deployment strategies? Are we considering blue-green deployments or canary releases?
John Smith: Canary releases might be a better fit, given the anticipated user volume. It allows us to roll out new features incrementally to smaller user groups first. Blue-green deployments could also work if we want to maintain zero-downtime during the rollout phase.
김민수: Both approaches have their merits, but I think canary releases make sense for this project, especially given the user volume. Ji-Hoon, can you draft a workflow for the QA process, including how we’ll validate during the canary release phase, and share it before our next meeting?
박지훈: Absolutely. I’ll include steps for unit, integration, and E2E testing along with timelines.
Alice Johnson: On the topic of timelines, how long are we planning for development?
김민수: Based on initial estimates, we’re looking at a 12-week cycle. Does that align with HQ’s expectations?
John Smith: It’s a bit tighter than expected, but doable with focused sprints and clear deliverables.
박지훈: Just to flag, QA will need at least two weeks within that timeline.
Alice Johnson: Noted. We’ll build buffer time into the backend tasks to accommodate that.
이영희: Weekly check-ins might help us stay on track. Should we schedule those now?
김민수: Great idea. Let’s go with every Monday at the same time.
John Smith: Works for me. And, Min-Soo, do you need any resources from HQ, like reusable Jenkins pipelines?
김민수: Yes, that would be great. If HQ has templates for pipelines or best practices for debugging, please share them.
Alice Johnson: I can document some debugging tips we’ve found useful in our projects. They’ve saved us countless hours.
박지훈: Debugging tips would be fantastic. A failing pipeline can really disrupt our momentum.
이영희: That would be super helpful. Debugging can really eat into time when CI/CD pipelines fail.
김민수: Excellent. With tools and workflows now decided, let’s wrap up. Any final thoughts?
Alice Johnson: Just one. Can we make the next meeting pet-friendly? My cat is very eager to make her debut.
이영희: I’m in! My dog would love it too.
박지훈: If this keeps up, we might need to rename the project “Pet CI/CD.”
김민수: Not sure how productive that would be, but it would definitely be entertaining!
John Smith: Agreed. Alright, let’s call it a day. Thanks, everyone, for the great discussion.
김민수: Thanks, team. Let’s regroup next week with updates on the CI/CD setup and testing workflow. Have a great day!
Alice Johnson: Bye, everyone!
John Smith: Take care, all.
